Why So Few Women Are Studying Computer Science
Recently in class we have been discussing why there aren't more women studying Computer Science in college. The article I read about this topic makes a few points about why this might be. While I may not agree with all of them, it is good to take into account other people opinions. The article brought up various points, from the toys children play with as they grow up to the culture surrounding the topic being very masculine and macho. Another big reason the article stated was that the reason women don't go into CS is because "women have historically chosen lower-paying yet fulfilling jobs like teaching or journalism, whereas their male counterparts, sometimes considered family providers, choose high-paying careers like computer science and engineering." I don't know about you, but I feel like I have a fulfilling job as a programmer right now. I love what I do and I couldn't imagine doing anything else.
The article then shifts into a different point of view by showing how some universities are trying to get more women to study Computer Science. At the end of the day, I don't think that you can dress up and change how the subject looks. Computer Science is math. There just happens to be a wrapper of English around it to make it a little more understandable. If you like math, then you should consider CS. If you hate math with the fiery passion of a thousand suns, then maybe you should consider something else. I don't care who you are or where you are from, if you don't like the subject, then don't study it! If we had more people studying what they loved rather than studying what someone told them to study just to fill a quota then I think that we would have much higher quality employees in all fields. If you like to teach, be a teacher! If you like to cook, be a chef!
---------------------------------
Extra commentary
---------------------------------
I tried to browse the comments after the article as well to get more insights, but as usual the comments ended up boiling down to people bickering and fighting. There was one good comment that I found interesting, and it was the very first one at the top by a Kris Roadruck.
"Most of the people I know that are really good at their craft in tech (be it programming or engineering or networks or what have you) got that way because as a kid they didn't really fit in. As a result they had a lot of extra hours to spend getting really good with computers instead of socializing. Eventually this lead them to careers with other similar social outcasts and they finally had a place they could fit in. Now women are saying listen we'd love to do tech but only if you change the environment where those before us finally fit in to look a lot more like the social environments that rejected them and lead them to getting good at computers in the first place. [...] Maybe instead of that you could instead just get really good at your craft. That would probably make you fit in without forcing everyone else around you to change."
While I may not agree completely with this, I do see where he is coming from. Computer Science has been a safe haven for the "nerds" and "outcasts" of society for a long time. While change may be good, I don't think that we should completely destroy a culture just to help a demographic to fit in. Integration with the culture is what should be happening. Of course the culture can evolve, but we shouldn't destroy it. Where would our technology be today if the computer scientists of the past were not sci-fi nerds? Where would all the dreams and ideas have come from?